Search for: "Leader v. MARONEY, PONZINI"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2010, 3:58 am
"Good cause" and "interest of justice" are two separate and independent statutory standards (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d at 104). [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:10 am
Maroney, Ponzini Spencer 97 N. 2d at 105-106, 736 N.Y.S.2d 291 , 761 E.2d 1018; Matter of Jordan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 5:21 am
“Under the circumstances, we find that, although plaintiff delayed in seeking an extension of his time to re-serve the complaint, the motion court appropriately exercised its discretion when it extended plaintiff’s time in the interest of justice (CPLR 306-b), as plaintiff established the existence of several relevant factors weighing in favor of an extension (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-105 [2001]; Chase Home Fin.… [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 3:51 am
Furthermore, while CPLR 306-b permits a court, in the exercise of its discretion, to [*2]extend the time to serve process upon good cause shown or in the interest of justice (see Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101), the plaintiffs did not move for, or otherwise request, an extension in the Supreme Court (see Lehman v North Greenwich Landscaping, LLC, 65 AD3d 1293, 1295; Matter of Saltzman v Board of Appeals of Vil.… [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 5:22 am
“An extension of time for service is a matter within the court’s discretion” (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101). [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
“An extension of time for service is a matter within the court’s discretion” (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 101 [2001]). [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
(Leader v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
CPLR 306-b authorizes an extension of time for service in two discrete situations: "upon good cause shown" or "in the interest of justice" (Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95, 104-106 [2001]). [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:30 am
The leading case on whether to grant or deny a motion to extend the time to serve under CPLR 306-b is Leader v Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 NY2d 95 [2001]. [read post]
