Search for: "Leahy v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned his conviction, saying the sheer amount of information that had been collected violated the Fourth Amendment, which bars unreasonable searches. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Legally, there are at least three options for Congress.First, there's the remedy that Senator Leahy invokes: The House or Senate that has voted for contempt can certify that fact to the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia, "whose duty it shall be to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 9:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, as some documents may suggest. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 6:36 pm
See Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:21 am
Attorney Roscoe Howard Jumps to Andrews Kurth "Roscoe Howard Jr., who served as the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia from 2001 until 2004, has joined the Washington office of Houston-based Andrews Kurth. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
Opening their six-minute tête-à-tête, Leahy began by asking the appellate court judge about about what Kavanaugh wrote in November 2015 in a case known as Klayman v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
McEwen* Introduction In the article included in the Stein McEwen Newsletter entitled Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: What Is The Practical Effect of First-to-File for Patent Applicants (October 2011), the novelty portions of the American Invents Act were explored. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
§102(a).[24] As an illustration of how this might represent a change, lets look at the facts in Motionless Keyboard Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in Vizer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in Vizer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in Vizer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in Vizer v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
The plaintiff in Vizer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
When Leahy asked if he changed his opinion on privacy rights following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Carpenter v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:23 pm
” The district court denied Turkey’s motion to dismiss because – applying a test from 1988’s Berkovitz v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 9:35 am
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, forty-five states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands have enacted legislation requiring notification of security breaches involving personal information.However, the laboratory of the states has produced some fairly disjoint legislation (most states has different requirements for disclosure and levels of liability), and Congress is starting to notice. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s opinion in Al Odah v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia’s decision in Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association Inc. and Military-Veterans Advocacy Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
Covington 17-1364 Issues: (1) Whether the district court had jurisdiction to consider challenges to the new districting plan the North Carolina General Assembly enacted after North Carolina’s previous state districting plan was invalidated as a racial gerrymander; (2) whether the district court erred by finding that four districts were racially gerrymandered even though the legislature did not consider race; (3) whether the district… [read post]
