Search for: "Leahy v. Leahy"
Results 81 - 100
of 784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2012, 11:23 pm
Senator Leahy’s remarks are available through his official web site, “Patrick Leahy, United States Senator for Vermont. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 2:20 pm
The BizJournal obliquely referred to KSR v. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 4:35 am
Supreme Court agreed to hear Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
In Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 7:17 pm
The petition of the day is: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- One of the many changes introduced into U.S. patent law by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act were provisions for post-grant review (PGR) and inter partes review (IPR). [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 10:17 pm
No mention of substantive rulemaking authority; without this, some variant of Tafas v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:26 pm
WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 9:53 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- On Tuesday, Senator Arlen Spector (R-PA) (at right), the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT), requesting that the Senate patent reform bill (S. 515) "not be placed on the Executive Business Agenda until late May, after the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has the opportunity to hear argument in Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 7:10 pm
In a recent FOIA case, EPIC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:18 pm
Noonan -- As the dodo of patent practice, the number of interferences has been steadily dwindling since enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act in 2012 abolished the practice in favor of a "first inventor to file" regime and a derivation proceeding for instances where a patentee is found to have taken the invention from the true inventor (35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
[DDC: The USPTO's interpretation of the one-year deadline appears to be in tension to the text of the new statute, but the PTO may be fine because of the deference for OED matters under Lavacara v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:48 pm
Last week, Specter sent a letter to Leahy telling him to put the brakes on a similar version of the bill until the Federal Circuit -- the high court of patent law -- hears arguments in Lucent Technologies v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:04 pm
The report marks the completion of a study conducted by the Office in response to an April 2020 request by Senators Thom Tillis and Patrick Leahy following the Supreme Court’s decision in Allen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:59 pm
" This sentiment can describe much of U.S. patent law over the last decade and a half, between the ill-fated USPTO "claims and continuation" rules, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, and the Supreme Court's various forays into numerous areas of the law. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:15 am
OVERTURNING OF GUNN V. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 9:14 pm
Noonan -- The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act prescribed two very different post-grant review proceedings in U.S. patent law. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:23 pm
Noonan -- Many of the complaints from patent holders over the PTO's inter partes review process under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (codified in pertinent part at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
