Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Consider in that regard the Supreme Court’s Rule 19, which not only provides wholly different procedures for cases in which a question has been certified by a Court of Appeals, but also stresses that “When a question is certified by a United States court of appeals, this Court, on its own motion or that of a party, may consider and decide the entire matter in controversy. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm
On October 20, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a “Request for Comments on Discretion To Institute Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board” in the Federal Register. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 11:57 am
United States, 126 S. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:35 am
What it does: The amendment would undo a unanimous Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:23 pm
” If enacted, such a legislative reform would bring the statute into alignment with the 2010 decision of the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:15 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed the Federal Circuits’ Decision for the Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
At issue in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 12:45 pm
§ 101 in view of the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
" The landmark 1953 case that gave vitality to the "state secrets" privilege was United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 11:23 pm
Senator Leahy’s remarks are available through his official web site, “Patrick Leahy, United States Senator for Vermont. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:06 pm
ACCA is hearing oral argument on Wednesday in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 9:23 am
” In United States v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 10:23 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 7:52 am
Smartflash v. [read post]
