Search for: "Leander v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am by INFORRM
  This view was expressed most clearly by the Court of Human Rights in the well-known case of Leander v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 5:49 pm
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 78, no. 3, 2018) is out. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:35 am by Natasha Nguyen
An established line of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decisions, beginning with Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHHR 433, has confirmed that art 10 includes the right to receive information from others who wish to impart it. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am by INFORRM
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:06 am by tracey
(In Administration) v Styles & Wood Ltd. [2011] EWHC 3464 (TCC) (22 December 2011) Alstom Power Ltd v Somi Impianti SRL [2011] EWHC 3941 (TCC) (21 December 2011) Leander Construction Ltd v Mulalley & Company Ltd [2011] EWHC 3449 (TCC) (21 December 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:18 am by INFORRM
” Now after A, plainly the refusal to provide information to the media by the state does engage Article 10. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:34 pm by Tobias Thienel
Thus, it may be recognized that the state enjoys a broad margin of appreciation e.g. in matters of national security (see Leander v. [read post]