Search for: "Leathers v. Leathers"
Results 1 - 20
of 544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 11:20 am
Design Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:33 pm
Razo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:15 am
Both charges involved the sexual assault of Leather’s [...] [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 8:58 pm
The case cite is Design Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:24 pm
The case cite is Design Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
So, let's get started.Do you remember United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:06 pm
#StopTheSADScheme Case Citation: Jiangsu Huari Webbing Leather Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 3:26 am
Daniel Sokol Yet another entry into the analysis of Leegin comes from Lino Graglia of the University of Texas Law School titled Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 7:35 am
The middle way between rule of reason and per se would allow claims if the plaintiff cites any of the factors the Supreme Court noted in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:31 am
In the latest development in the "Toxic Sofa" litigation (see our blogs of 30 March 2010 and 29 April 2010), the High Court has ruled in (1) Argos Ltd (2) Homebase Ltd and Others v Leather Trade House Ltd (Formerly BLC Leather Technology Centre Ltd) [2012] EWHC 1348 (QB) that Argos and Homebase are able to recover by way of an indemnity from Leather Trade House the sums they had paid out to victims of a harmful anti-fungal chemical used in their… [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:16 am
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:41 am
The English High Court, in Clare Horwood & Others v Land of Leather (In Administration) & Zurich Insurance PLC & Others [2010] EWHC 546 (Comm), held that Zurich did not have to pay compensation to customers who suffered burns from "toxic sofas" sold by the now-defunct Land of Leather. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:41 am
The English High Court, in Clare Horwood & Others v Land of Leather (In Administration) & Zurich Insurance PLC & Others [2010] EWHC 546 (Comm), held that Zurich did not have to pay compensation to customers who suffered burns from "toxic sofas" sold by the now-defunct Land of Leather. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:02 am
The district court also erred in finding that laches bared the brewery’s infringement counterclaims and that no reasonable jury could find that the clothier did not commit fraud on the USPTO when it obtained its registrations (Excelled Sheepskin & Leather Coat Corp. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:22 am
Supreme Court rewrote part of the antitrust laws in a decision called Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:34 am
Quarterman Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:42 am
In Coach Services v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONLeathers v Approved Oil Co. of Brooklyn, Inc. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
Hard Candy Cases, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:32 am
Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. [read post]
