Search for: "Lebel v. Mai"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2012, 4:49 pm
On May 17, 2012, leave was granted by the Supreme Court (per Justices LeBel, Fish and Cromwell) in the Quebec Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAMs) case (Samsung Electronics Co., et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
As Lebel J. recognized, with a “globalized world comes the sometimes poisonous gift of ubiquity. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:56 pm
In a unanimous decision in Schreyer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:20 am
”McLachlin and Lebel strongly disagreed. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:00 am
We wrote about the Eric v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:50 am
Second, LeBel J. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:21 pm
v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:51 pm
” Lebel v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:18 pm
Justice LeBel and Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 6:47 am
” The shock-jock argument was advanced by Justice LeBel’s dissent in WIC Radio Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The legal status of polygamyRacial equality, aboriginal rights, and Section 15: examining R. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:34 am
A preliminary inquiry judge ordered her to remove the veil when she testified, and appeals pushed the case to the Supreme Court.Justices Louis LeBel and Marshall Rothstein concurred with the judgment on dismissing the appeal, but argued for “a clear rule that niqabs may not be worn at any stage of the criminal trial” in the interests of openness and religious neutrality. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
As the Supreme Court said in Canada (Human Rights Commission) v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
” Lebel v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:29 pm
Westmount (City) v. [read post]
