Search for: "Lederer v. Lederer"
Results 61 - 80
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Defense lawyers, who I believe were the Leder Law Group in D.C., filed a motion to compel. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Defense lawyers, who I believe were the Leder Law Group in D.C., filed a motion to compel. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Sources GMCR 8-K Disclosing SEC Inquiry Michelle Stacy’s Form 4 disclosing sale of GMCR stock and option Interesting Issues in Timing of Green Mountain Insider Stock Sales and Disclosure of SEC Inquiry by Sam Antar in White Collar Fraud Whistleblower alledges insider trading at GMCR by WCAX.com Green Mountain Coffee: Beware the Valley Below by Scott Crown in Seeking Alpha Green Mountain and the multi-tasking 8-K… by Michelle Leder in Footnoted Green Mountain Coffee Will Have… [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:00 am
Tex., Case No. 2:09-cv-00256-TJW-CE, filed Aug. 24, 2009); and (2) Saffran v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Boston Scientific and Boston Scientific v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
[An abbreviated version of this article appears in Laura Lederer and Richard Delgado, eds. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
In Babakar v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:47 am
In Babakar v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
"'In order to sustain a claim for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish both that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession which results in actual damages to a plaintiff, and that the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits of the underlying action "but for" the attorney's negligence'" (Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 4:35 am
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438 [2007]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008 [1996]; Carmel v Lunney, 70 NY2d 169 [1987]). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 4:39 am
The failure to demonstrate proximate cause requires dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007])" (id. at 797). [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:18 pm
The British Columbia proceeding, Boundary Museum Society v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:56 pm
Zurich Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:32 pm
" United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 9:41 am
Lederer. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:26 am
In [*2]any event, Lederer fails to show that it suffered any actual damages as a result of defendants' conduct (see Postel v Jaffe & Segal, 237 AD2d 127 [1997]" [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 2:01 pm
Enligt vad man kan läsa pÃ¥ bloggarna blev Rost själv lite förvÃ¥nad först, men sen har han döpt om sin egen blogg till "Peter Rost for FDA commissioner".Det finns en önskan frÃ¥n flera hÃ¥ll att fÃ¥ en… [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 2:56 pm
- Vokterne spurte oss om vi ba vår bønn. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:32 pm
Collings v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
Leder, 191 AD2d 199, 200 [1st Dept 1993]. [read post]
