Search for: "Lee v. Does" Results 1 - 20 of 3,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
Appreciating First Amendment protections, the ELVIS Act continues to provide certain exemptions from liability, like those found in the 1984 Act, where the unauthorized use is (i) in connection with news, public affairs, or sports broadcast or account; (ii) for the purpose of comment, criticism, scholarship, satire, or parody; (iii) a representation of the person in an audiovisual work (provided it does not create a false impression that the work is an authentic recording of that… [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:03 am by Mavrick Law Firm
Lee, 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014) (“A receiver of entities used to perpetrate a Ponzi scheme does not have standing to sue on behalf of the defrauded investors but does have standing to sue on behalf of the corporations that were injured by the Ponzi scheme operator. [read post]
(For discussion of why “shouting down,” even though expressive, is not protected from government prohibition, see this recent column by one of us.)Calling physical blockage peaceful because it does not involve overt and affirmative violent assaults on third parties does nothing to alter its lack of constitutional status. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
Ecclesiastical Law Society At the AGM of the Society yesterday, Lee Coley was elected as Chair in succession to Elizabeth Wilson. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The officer appealed, and the Court of Appeals sends the case back to trial on this issue.The issue is Jok v. [read post]