Search for: "Lee v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2019, 4:19 am
However, a registration is required if filing a copyright infringement suit, and the Supreme Court recently held in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 am
Walro v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 8:03 pm
Tim Lee has a remarkable story at Ars Technica about a remarkable copyright case, McGucken v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
As Keyssar observes of the failure of the proportionalist Lodge-Gossett reform of 1950 (led by the liberal Republican senator Henry Cabot Lodge of Massachusetts and the Texas segregationist representative Ed Lee Gossett): “an institutional reform that, in itself, had long been regarded as democratic, might well have anti-democratic consequences in a nation containing a large region that lacked universal suffrage” (164). [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
The transcript of Judge Edgardo Ramos’ Wednesday hearing in Restis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 8:40 pm
As as aside, Mark and I discussed the use of the Necessity defense many moons ago in the context of the Casa Express v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 5:04 pm
The bills would codify the 2010 decision in Warshak v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
In Support of Neither Party Amicus: Professor Edward Lee. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:44 am
The commission concluded the PAC could not act as an independent expenditure committee, receiving contributions from corporations and unlimited contributions from individuals, because the PAC is controlled by a federal office holder, Senator Michael Lee. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 5:40 pm
Catalina v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:13 pm
The court answered no in Troy Lee v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 7:30 am
Lee, 784 N.E.2d 566, 578 (Ind. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:29 am
Professor Christie wondered if these developments were in the aggregate tilting too much in favor of the right holder. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
Scrivani, Stevens & Lee, Elizabeth Ware, Stevens & Lee, pro hac vice & Nicholas H. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
Holder, in which the Court will consider whether “a regulatory deadline by which motions to reopen must be filed could be bent. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:05 am
By Jake McGowan Rosen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 5:30 am
The judge disagreed, stating that neither BoC nor MPI imposed a data security duty on the holders of information but instead prohibit actions by the holder that are inconsistent with the obligations of confidence and privacy. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
Lee (preference in employment)* U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:55 am
Magistrate Lee concluded that Dr. [read post]
