Search for: "Lee v. Johnson" Results 1 - 20 of 497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 8:58 pm by Josh Blackman
This case is the inverse of Justice Scalia ruling in favor of the flag-burning Gregory Lee Johnson. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
Johnson  (23-175) The city of Grants Pass, Ore., has three ordinances related to bans on camping and sleeping on public property. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
Any issue preclusion consequences of that decision are your own doing, and I find it implausible that you can be heard to complain about them.So I understand and appreciate Judge Lee's attempt to provide an advance viewing of his position on a topic that's not at issue in the present case but that may perhaps nonetheless arise in some cases in the future. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am by jonathanturley
BET founder Robert Johnson has called for $14 trillion in federal reparations. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
To shed light on the issue and encourage people to back our campaign for a proper ban on hunting, we have produced a powerful animation narrated by the talented actress Poppy Lee Friar which you can watch below. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
Natasha Bertrand, MJ Lee, Alex Marquardt, and Oren Liebermann report for CNN. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
The Andrew Johnson administration understood [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
On 1 November, J Johnson handed down judgement of preliminary issues in the case of Clarke v Guardian [2023] EWHC 2734 (KB). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
IPSO 18055-23 Rizwan v essexlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 18056-23 Rizwan v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), No breach – after investigation 18057-23 Rizwan v getreading.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 14277-23 Booley v birminghammail.co.uk (Birmingham… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]