Search for: "Lee v. Merit Systems Protection Board" Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under various Peoples Republic of China (PRC) laws and regulations on employment, several characteristics of individuals are protected from discrimination in employment, such as nationality, race, gender, religious belief and disability (Protected Characteristics). [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
If the EOIR disciplinary counsel determines that a complaint is without merit, no further action will be taken. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Overturning the European Commission of Human Rights’ decision, the Court held that freedom of artistic expression merits protection under Article 10. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
I am telling my story here to highlight the history behind whistleblower protections that have been legislated since Enron’s collapse and the efforts by some to dismantle those protections. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  My reasons are as follows: (a) The word “maintained” in BL 86 is about the preservation of the continuity of the jury system. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The authors in the series have included truly remarkable scholars, including not only the individuals you mention above, but also Cass Sunstein, Pam Karlan, Lee Bollinger, Mark Tushnet, Michael Klarman, and on and on and on. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
Nicholas Eberstadt will moderate, and Jean Lee, Tara O, Joshua Stanton and Sung-Yoon Lee will participate in the panel. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am by assoulineberlowe
Nikooie in the original trial on the merits, which was heard in 2010 before Gil Freeman in Miami-Dade Circuit Court’s Complex Commercial Division. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Merit Systems Protection Board, in which the justices held that district court is the proper forum for a “mixed” case, involving both adverse action and discrimination, that is dismissed by the MSPB on jurisdictional grounds. [read post]