Search for: "Lee v. Perez"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Perez v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Perez v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 12:00 am
James V. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm
Thanks to Paul Caron, I came across Perez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Lee, by Bethany R. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
Perez. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
In my view, these statutory provisions do not establish a basis for an order displacing the usual rule… [44] While the Court of Appeal in Perez v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
Lee, 329 F.3d 330 (3d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 124 S. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
Perez, 2010 WL 3036217 (N.D. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm
Wirtz, 392 U.S., at 190 , 198; Perez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Lee of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 6:33 am
Lee of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
