Search for: "Lee v. Small Claims Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 371
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
Lee, 709 N.E.2d 736, 744 (Ind. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:32 pm
SCOTUSblog will be starting an online symposium on Lee v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
(Wickard v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
Patent and Trademark Office over the office’s refusal to trademark the band’s name is before the Supreme Court this term in Lee v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Three Clinic doctors—Kaouk, Goel, and Lee–were involved in his case. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:00 am
Close followers of the cases FTC v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Lee, 136 S. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:52 am
One small aspect of Director Michelle Lee’s testimony to congress was that the number of pending pre-GATT applications still pending has been reduced to only 20 – not counting those owned by Gill Hyatt. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:53 am
See, e.g., Bonamar v. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
It’s an amazing place, with one small, but important flaw: none of the clocks seem to work. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 1:44 pm
Cambridge-Lee Industries, a decision rendered by federal Magistrate Judge Henry S. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
Lee (argued April 25, 2016). [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm
The statement in open court was approved subject to two small amendments. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:20 am
Lee 15-789Issue: (1) Whether, for federal habeas purposes, California’s procedural rule generally barring review of claims that were available but not raised on direct appeal is an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim; and (2) whether, when a federal habeas petitioner argues that a state procedural default is not an “adequate” state-law ground for rejection of a claim, the burden of persuasion as to adequacy rests on… [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:01 pm
& Lee L. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City barring property owners from filing a federal takings claim in federal court until they exhaust state court remedies, when this rule results in numerous jurisdictional “anomalies” and has a “dramatic” negative impact on takings law under San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. [read post]
