Search for: "Lee v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,553
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2025, 11:05 am
– Precedent: Speiser v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 9:02 pm
Lee v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
Elk v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
Calling it “the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen,” Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 2:00 am
On 8 April 2025, the ECtHR handed down judgement in the case of Green v The United Kingdom (Application no. 22077/19). [read post]
12 Apr 2025, 7:47 pm
In the case of State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 7:04 pm
Criminal law — Motion to compel testimony — Judicial error Appellant, Jaime Havier Lee, was convicted of second-degree murder on May 15, 2023, for fatally stabbing Cornelius Lyons on May […] [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 6:56 pm
Criminal law — Reopening of case — Sufficiency of evidence A jury, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, convicted Shelton Holt, appellant, of second-degree murder and use of […] [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 10:06 am
Case Citation: Lee v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 5:20 am
That is a reference to the court’s decision in Murthy v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 5:23 pm
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 9:41 am
To put it another way, such a reading of § 706 would obviate Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
Australian Federal Court Backs India on Sovereign Immunity: Another Twist in the Devas v. India Saga
3 Apr 2025, 4:32 am
In deciding whether India has waived its immunity, the Primary judge invoked the judgement of the High Court of Australia (“High Court) in Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services (“Spain v. [read post]
30 Mar 2025, 10:08 am
Circuit case: LoBue v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 6:55 pm
Our Circuit has held that security clearance decisions are within the purview of the Executive Branch, see Lee v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 7:00 am
These included: a ban on Chinese children attending public school (Tape v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
In Lee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
In Lee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 7:47 am
In Lee v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 9:53 am
The Board's stated justification is the kind of viewpoint discrimination proscribed by the Court in Rosenberger v. [read post]
