Search for: "Lee v. Stokes" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm
Here's a link to a more detailed summary.Forrest Lee Stokes v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]). [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
The following is a series of questions prompted by the publication of Lee C. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Research and Resources To Reform Social Media, Reform Informational Capitalism, Social Media, Freedom of Speech and the Future of Our Democracy; Lee Bollinger and Geoffrey R. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am by Jordan Brunner
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm by Stephen Sachs
Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Worst Constitutional Decision of All Time, 78 Notre Dame L. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Stokes v Ragless  [2017] SASC 159 Bampton J awarded general and aggravated damages of Aus$90.000 in respect of website, email and Facebook publications. [read post]