Search for: "Lee v. The United States of America et al" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Magley, et al (NFP) - "Appellant/Defendant Cadleway Properties, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
United States, and American Needle v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:36 am by Jeralyn
Chigbo Peter Umeh, et. al. , Case No. 09 cr 00524, Southern District of New York), no cocaine was ever shipped to Africa, let alone to the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm by Law Lady
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Fallon, Jr., et al., Hart and Wechsler’s the Federal Courts and the Federal System (2015); see also Richard H. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am by law shucks
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]