Search for: "Lee v. United States Government"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2017, 2:23 pm
United States, decided on June 23, 2017. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 9:17 am
In Adrian Lee v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
Thanks SCOTUSBlog for putting up the link to the oral argument transcript in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:14 am
United States (No. 18-1059), coined the Bridgegate case. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:48 pm
By Kiran Jassal The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments for Lee v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:36 pm
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, On Lee v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
Oregon can never be one of the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
(In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1382.)'" blank">U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 8:55 am
United States, concerning interpretation of the First Step Act. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:56 pm
Probably United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:15 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 4:48 pm
(18-1059) (Preview of United States... [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:34 am
As Judge Lee explains at the end of the opinion:"This is an unfortunate case with a potentially unjust outcome for the Libitzkys. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:08 pm
Because the date of an entry of a judgment is governed by 2-601(b), the Court examined that rule’s recent history and noted that the Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure in 2014 had proposed amendments to address the obsolescence of the then-current rule (requiring physical recordation on the file jacket) and lack of uniformity across the State in how clerks entered judgments. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today’s decision in United States v. [read post]
