Search for: "Legal Defenders, P.C."
Results 121 - 140
of 2,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2012, 2:49 am
These allegations are sufficient to state a claim for legal malpractice (see Garnett v Fox, Horan & Camerini, LLP, 82 AD3d 435, 435 [2011]; see generally Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C., 21 AD3d 1082, 1083 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 701 [2005]). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:51 am
The Court finds that plaintiff has failed, however, to satisfy the third prong under the Brock test because plaintiff knew of the proposed defendants' potential liability at the time she filed a legal malpractice action against defendant. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:34 am
The Court finds that plaintiff has failed, however, to satisfy the third prong under the Brock test because plaintiff knew of the proposed defendants' potential liability at the time she filed a legal malpractice action against defendant. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:29 am
Stein, P.C., Robert M. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 6:23 am
Gobindram v Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., 2019 NY Slip Op 06190 Decided on August 21, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department stand for the proposition that when an attorney has a second chance to correct mistakes and fails to do so, a claim for legal malpractice may be good. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:39 am
“The plaintiffs allegedly were the victims of a foreclosure rescue scam perpetrated by the defendants Donado Law Firm, P.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
In order to establish a prima facie claim of negligence, or the failure to exercise reasonable care, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty of care owed by defendant to plaintiff; (2) conduct below the applicable standard of care that amounts to a breach of that duty; (3) an injury or loss; (4) cause in fact; and (5) proximate, or legal, cause. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:26 am
In order to establish a prima facie claim of negligence, or the failure to exercise reasonable care, a plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) a duty of care owed by defendant to plaintiff; (2) conduct below the applicable standard of care that amounts to a breach of that duty; (3) an injury or loss; (4) cause in fact; and (5) proximate, or legal, cause. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
"Plaintiffs-Appellants Curtis & Associates, P.C. and W. [read post]
5 May 2024, 8:56 pm
Jon Katz, P.C. law firm’s website https://katzjustice.com The entire website is copyrighted © Jon Katz, P.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 8:37 pm
Jon Katz, P.C. law firm’s website https://katzjustice.com The entire website is copyrighted © Jon Katz, P.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Venezia thereafter hired the defendants John H. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:44 am
(hereinafter together Weaver), and the defendants Stella Azie and Stella Azie, P.C. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:53 am
The fiduciary duty of an attorney, however, "extends both to current clients and former clients and thus is broader in scope than a cause of action for legal malpractice" (TVGA Eng'g, Surveying, P.C., 45 [*2]AD3d at 1256; see Greene v Greene, 47 NY2d 447, 453). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 3:43 am
Calabro & Assoc., P.C. v Katz ;2010 NY Slip Op 50192(U) ;Decided on February 9, 2010 ; Appellate Term, First Department . [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 11:27 pm
The relevant portion of the opinion states: Plaintiffs allege that their long-time attorneys, defendants John Golieb, Esq. and Muchnick, Golieb & Golieb, P.C. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:18 am
these legal malpractice defendant attorneys forgot the rule that no actual amount must be pled... [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:30 pm
Jon Katz, P.C. law firm’s website https://katzjustice.com The entire website is copyrighted © Jon Katz, P.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
(quoting John Kohl & Co., P.C. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:19 am
Justice Ling-Cohan writes a basic textbook of how an account stated case is decided in an attorney fee setting in Mintz & Fraade, P.C. v Docuport, Inc. [read post]
