Search for: "Legrand v. New York State" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 2:30 am
As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
(NY Murder Conviction Overturned for Denial of ID Expert) As previously reported, last month the New York Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in People v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 10:07 pm
Major ruling on eyewitness ID The New York Court of Appeals yesterday in People v LeGrand, 2007 NY Slip Op 02588, on the issue of eyewitness ID. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
(“American”) appeals from the October 11, 2012, judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Paul A. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
 Our state’s highest court reversed and ordered a new trial. [read post]
16 May 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Another post discusses a recent limitation of liability decision from the Norther District of New York. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am by Caitlin Byars
This case comes before the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals on appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am by Caitlin Byars
This case comes before the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals on appeal from a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by New York Criminal Defense
 Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:27 pm by Danielle Wild
 Thus, the New York Court of Appeals has accordingly concluded that, in appropriate cases, experts should be allowed to inform juries about research findings regarding many of the factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness memory (see People v LeGrand, 8 NY3d 449, 452 [2007]; People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 661 [2011]; People v Abney, 13 NY3d 251, 267 [2011]). [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  After an adverse judgment from the Southern District of New York, the defendant appealed to the Second Circuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
And now the New York Court of Appeals has cited Chambers for this same proposition. [read post]