Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure"
Results 1 - 20
of 668
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Lees Leisure Industries, Ltd. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
Harper v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:59 am
Alemo-Herron and Others v Parkwood Leisure Ltd Court of Appeal “After a competitive transfer to the private sector of local authority services, and thence to further private-sector employment, the second private employers were not bound by a collective pay settlement agreed between the local authority and trade unions. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:23 am
Copeland v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:44 am
International Leisure Ltd and another v First National Trustee Co UK Ltd and others: [2012] EWHC 1971 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 208 “The rule against reflective loss and the extent to which a shareholder could sue for loss primarily suffered by and primarily belonging to a company did not extend to loss suffered by holders of a debenture.” WLR Daily, 16th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 7:19 am
Without leisure you might, like V, the eponymous hero of V for Vendetta, become too fixed on just one goal. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 7:02 am
Real property — Homeowners Association Act — Election of directors Three residents and homeowners of a senior housing community known as Leisure World filed a putative class action complaint seeking a judgment declaring that the selection process used by the community’s homeowners association to elect directors to its Board of Directors violates the Maryland Homeowners ... [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:33 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure Ltd and others (Union des Associations Europeenes de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Ltd, Setanta Sports sarl, Groupe Canal Plus SA and Motion Picture Association intervening) “The court had jurisdiction under CPR r 19.2(a) to join parties as claimants to national court proceedings in which questions had been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities where the joinder applications were… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Leisure Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:09 am
Jim Hillan and Rachel Arnison, who both work in the tax team at CMS, comment on the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court in the Scottish appeal of Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc, [2018] UKSC 35: Further to our previous blog on this case, the Supreme Court has overturned the judgment of the Inner House of the Court of Session. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
Employment Tribunal Following Whent v T Cartledge Ltd, BET Catering Services Ltd v Ball and Glendale Managed Services Ltd v Graham, the Appellants claimed that Regulation 5 of TUPE obliged the Respondent to comply with the Collective Agreements and it had therefore made unauthorised deductions from their pay in not doing so. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
In the recent case of Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron & Ors [2011] UKSC 26 the Supreme Court was asked to resolve an important issue concerning the exact scope of that protection. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am
However, Taylor Clark’s appeal to the Inner House of the Court of Session was allowed (Clark Leisure Plc v A Decision of the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [2016] CSIH 54). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:41 am
Federal Court:Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162Full Federal Court:Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 51S123 of the Trade Marks Act sets out that a person does not infringe a trade mark if the trade mark has been applied by or with the consent of the registered owner of the trade mark.Infringement takes place when the alleged infringing use is use as a trade mark. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:17 am
http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/murphys-law-of-licensing.htmlhttp://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/copyright-vs-competition-law-new-dawn.htmlFootball Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure; Karen Murphy v Media Protection Service Ltd [C-403/08 and C-429/08] [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:18 pm
Holley argued over […] The post DEMARIO HENRY v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:38 am
Supreme Court Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] UKSC 25 (15 June 2011) Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo -Herron and others [2011] UKSC 26 (15 June 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Enrico Bonadio, City University London, the City Law School, and Mauro Santo, M&R Europe, Intellectual Property Legal Advisors, Milan, have published 'Communication to the Public' in FAPL v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (C-403/08 and C-429/08) at... [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:04 am
QC Leisure and Murphy v. [read post]
