Search for: "Leitner v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
 It explained that The conspiracy statute under which the jury convicted Leitner criminalizes conspiracies to either: (1) commit any offense against the United States; or (2) defraud the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
  Consider, for instance, Darshan-Leitner’s most prominent (if temporary) legal victory: Sokolow v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  According to the indictment, Leitner was previously a defendant in a criminal trial, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:30 am by Thomas Lee
Lee is the Leitner Family Professor of Law at Fordham Law School and a Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School in 2012-13.] [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:52 am by Lee E. Berlik
The plaintiff learned this the hard way in the case of Sarah Leitner v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" It seems to say that someone from New York cannot sue Pennsylvania in federal court, but that's not how the courts have interpreted it.The case is Leitner v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:57 am
  In alphabetical order, they are:Jim Leitner  "Leitner was prosecutor, now defense attorney. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:45 pm by Robert Tanha
In a January 2010 ruling by the Ontario Superior Court, Leitner v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am by Garrett Hinck
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May… [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:28 pm
In fact the article is a rigorous critique of the case law of the Court of Justice and in particular of its judgment in Case C-376/98 Germany v. [read post]