Search for: "Lemieux v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 2:24 pm by Jon Levitan
United States</em> appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:01 am by Amy Howe
” At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston provides a general overview of United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
As Scott Lemieux states, "[u]nder current practices, the AUMF George W. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
 If the Judiciary Act of 1789 and related legislation better explain the establishment and development of judicial review in the United States than Marbury v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
United States and suggests that the case “raises a difficult puzzle about why courts invalidate vague statutes that have clear applications. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports that the State of Washington filed its brief yesterday in Doe #1 v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:42 am by SHG
The speech is protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 2:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
One such legislator was United States Representative Carolyn McCarthy. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am by Marissa Miller
” And at the American Prospect, Scott Lemieux argues that the case “provides a disturbing look at the death penalty system in the United States and underscores how even people facing execution are often not represented by adequate counsel at any stage of the criminal process. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am by Andrew Hamm
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]