Search for: "Lemon v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm by Betty Lupinacci
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 8:17 am
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:55 pm by Patricia Salkin
Constitution, but the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found against them. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 12:44 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, although no opinion commanded a majority of the Court. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:30 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Because I think the Lemon test has been superseded by and subsumed into the endorsement test ("The proper inquiry under the purpose prong of Lemon, I submit, is whether the government intends to convey a message of endorsement or disapproval of religion," Lynch v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
In a speech on the eve of the 1940 election addressing the United States’ defense capabilities as World War II engulfed Europe, Roosevelt pledged, “Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
  At this point, Justice Fruchter jumped in to recite the three prongs of the test first articulated in Lemon v. [read post]