Search for: "Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 12:56 pm
The defendant got 1,000 impressions and 61 clicks. - 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
See 1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am
See Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. , 103 USPQ2d at 1676." [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:02 am
The decision is consistent with, and cites, the 2012 Federal Circuit decision in the long-running saga of Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
UPDATE: Since this post first went up in 2007, Eric Goldman addressed the issue here (2009) and then, in the context of the 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:44 am
Publ’ns, Inc., 135 USPQ 374, 375 (TTAB 1962). [2] Ex parte Meredith Publ’g Co., 109 USPQ 426, 426 (Comm’r Pats. 1956). [3] Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
[Note: I still have to blog the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
Feb. 5, 2015); 1–800–Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:30 am
GoTo.com: the search engine defendant generated $345 in revenue (not profit, just revenue) from the litigated terms. 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
See 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:27 am
Lens.com Inc., 2:2007cv00591 (filed 08/13/2007) * 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:49 am
* Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts complaint. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Trademark * 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
(TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps 1-800 Contacts – Utah District Court rejects 1-800 Contacts Google Adword lawsuit against Lens.com: 1-800 Contacts v Lens.com (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) ICG – Search engines sued for accepting keyword advertising on ‘Cheese of the Month Club’ trademark: Pathak v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:38 am
Lens.com, Inc., 722 F.3d 1229 (10th Cir. 2013) and Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 10:00 am
It’s been years since the doctrine actually helped a plaintiff win a case; and to the extent other courts follow the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:42 am
"Whether a non-syndicated column that is, for example, “printed, downloadable, or recorded on electronic media,” TMEP Section 1202.07(a), is a good in trade should be analyzed using the same standard we use to assess goods in trade issues in other contexts.The Board therefore adopted a new test, based on Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 686 F.3d 1376, 103 USPQ2d 1672, 1676 (Fed. [read post]
