Search for: "Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
UPDATE: Since this post first went up in 2007, Eric Goldman addressed the issue here (2009) and then, in the context of the 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
In 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:06 am
1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
By Eric Goldman 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 3:04 am
See Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. , 103 USPQ2d at 1676." [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 11:30 am
The case cite is Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Case No. 2011-1258 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
On August 3, 2012, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in the case Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:37 am
Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800-Contacts, Inc., No. 2011-1258 (Fed. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am
" The Board found that "software is merely incidental to [Lens.com's] retail sale of contact lenses, and is not a 'good in trade.'" Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 103 USPQ2d 1672 (Fed. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
* Update on the Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
See 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
Lens.com, Inc., 755 F.Supp. 2d 1151 (D. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
–1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:00 am
The defendant got 1,000 impressions and 61 clicks. - 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:05 pm
Trademark * 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:49 am
* Lens.com v. 1-800 Contacts complaint. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 12:56 pm
The defendant got 1,000 impressions and 61 clicks. - 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:54 pm
As the most recent example, see the 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
