Search for: "Leonard v. Peters et al"
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 11:54 am
" Caption: Schron et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:54 am
" Caption: Schron et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:12 am
Barbara Callado, et al. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 8:31 pm
"Once again: Tyson does not challenge in any way the data that Arcidiacono, et al., presented, that black students at Duke disproportionately migrate away from more difficult (science and engineering) to easier (liberal arts) majors. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:11 am
The 6-2 decision (with Justice Elena Kagan not taking part) came in the case of Golan, et al., v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC vacates FTC’s decision that Rambus breached antitrust duty by violating JEDEC patent disclosure rules and orders new trial: (Philip Brooks), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (IP Law360), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Hal Wegner), (IPBiz), (IP Law360), UK Court of Appeal rules on whether prior art not in the same design… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 1:35 pm
Professor Schauer’s discussion of statistical significance, covered in my last post,[1] is curious for its disclaimer that “there is no claim here that measures of statistical significance map easily onto measures of the burden of proof. [read post]
