Search for: "Lessig v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
After all, as Joel Reidenberg notes, “[t]echnological capabilities and system design choices impose rules on participants,” or, to quote Lawrence Lessig, “code is law. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
[Marbury v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Second, Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:00 am
Chiafalo v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 12:13 am
Second, Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 9:49 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 6:30 am
David SchwartzNext week, in Colorado Dept. of State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Harvard Law School professor, Lawrence Lessig, withdrew a lawsuit accusing The New York Times of “clickbait defamation” concerning his views toward the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, after the newspaper made changes to the online article that prompted the case. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:16 am
Kahle from 2006 as the plaintiff in Kahle v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
United States Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard Law School professor, sued The New York Times for defamation for falsely sugges [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz reads the modern Court from Wickard to Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" Ray v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Trying to nullify state capture. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
A Constitution Day plea for the study of state constitutions (Real Clear Politics). [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
’” That 1952 case, Ray v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:09 am
Instead, he is a purposivist and structuralist, who argues that fidelity to purpose and structure in changed contexts may sometimes justify departing from the text or adding things to the text.Part Two examines Lessig’s use of the concept of social meaning to explain and justify many of the Supreme Court’s most famous liberal decisions, including Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Pam Brandwein and Jack Balkin have offered excellent summaries of Lessig’s basic argument in their postings in this symposium. [read post]
