Search for: "Level 3 Communications, LLC v. Office of Administration (Majority Opinion)" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Gill, individually, and dba Major Express Logistics, Peoplease LLC, National Interstate Richfield, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
Government’s position for the Supreme Court’s review of Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
The majority opinion reasoned that this remedy could not be distinguished from damages awarded in common law fraud cases, and therefore a jury trial in federal court was required if requested by defendants. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm by Guest Author
The most emblematic demonstration of this phenomenon is the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Calcutt v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Supreme Court has also heard, or will hear, administrative law cases that will impact securities Several cases pending at the circuit court level may have wide-ranging effects on securities litigation as well. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
On June 27, DOL announced that it will reinstate its practice of issuing opinion letters, which had been on hiatus under the Obama administration. [read post]
All of these facts undermined the conclusion that impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. [read post]
All of these facts undermined the conclusion that impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
These areas are: (1) the scope of the definition of a dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; (2) cryptocurrencies; and (3) off-channel communications by broker-dealers. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:11 am
When an advertiser represents that claims have been scientifically established, the FTC has long held the advertiser to the level of evidence required to convince the relevant scientific community of the claim’s truthfulness. [read post]