Search for: "Levinson v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
See, e.g., Levinson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 1:20 pm
(Sandy Levinson wrote on the issue as well.) [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 2:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Sanford Levinson This post was prepared for a roundtable onFederation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 10:19 am
The case was closely watched because its outcome had the potential to transform securities class action litigation in the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:22 am
Reed, and Lawrence v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state and administrative courts in North Carolina, before the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, and before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:25 am
al : LexisNexis, 2011 1 v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:18 am
United States was correctly decided? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court decided Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm
The Second Circuit had held that “for ‘securities that are not traded on a domestic exchange,’ a transaction is considered ‘domestic if [1] irrevocable liability is incurred or [2] title passes within the United States.'” Petrobras, slip op. at 22 (quoting Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
