Search for: "Levitin v Levitin" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 3:00 am by Deeptak Gupta
"  While you're there, check out this other recent post by Levitin sketching out what he calls a broad "anti-consumer agenda," ranging from AT&T v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 9:23 am by Bankruptcy Prof
SCARBERRY, Pepperdine University School of Law Email: Mark.Scarberry@pepperdine.edu Professor Adam Levitin has responded to my recent symposium article critiquing proposed congressional legislation that would allow modification (including strip down) of home mortgages in Chapter... [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Even though I often disagree with Professor Levitin’s opinions and policy positions about consumer financial services developments, I maintain high respect for him because he is very knowledgeable in this area. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Damages awarded for the recording of intimate activities without consent but with limited broadcasting http://t.co/iSvwGEqo0w -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-02: 5 Seriously Dumb Myths About Copyright the Media Shou… http://t.co/1GnBM4jkKH -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2015-05-02 http://t.co/S31G5DETW9 -> Copyright law not extra territorial Levitin v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:30 am by Pamela Foohey
As Slipster Adam Levitin blogged, the "big picture" effect of this decision--and the 5th and 10th Circuits--is unclear. [read post]
18 May 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Now available online, via CanLII: Colour Coded: A Legal History of Racism in Canada, 1900-1950 by Constance Backhouse, which was originally published by University of Toronto Press in 1999.My Georgetown Law colleague Adam Levitin on the majority opinion in CFPB v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:19 pm by Rich Vetstein
Updated: Click Here For Our Oral Argument Recap Just a reminder to those following the important SJC case of Eaton v. [read post]