Search for: "Levy v. State Of California"
Results 41 - 60
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2010, 7:48 am
California courts have rejected both bad faith and "intent to chill" requirements. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:23 pm
The 2022 Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:26 am
California, 283 U.S. 359, 368-70 (1931), from CAAF’s own opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 11:34 am
United States and United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 7:37 am
“Doing so violates utility customers’ privacy rights under state law and the California Constitution while disproportionately subjecting Asian and Asian American communities to police scrutiny. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2008 opinion in Ross v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, fn. 11 [dicta stating "there is no rule requiring preservation of the original ratio between punitive damages and compensatory damages"].)But compare this decision to the Fifth Appellate District's opinion in McGee v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:43 pm
The petition acknowledged that Iskanian v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 1:03 pm
See Brown v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:40 am
The case, Hassell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:32 am
It was May, 2001, when congressional intern Chandra Levy disappeared and the rush to blame California Congressman Gary Condit was all over the papers. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:11 pm
In Harrington v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(…) In 2016, the Attorney General filed an enforcement action against Ethicon on behalf of the People of the State of California. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:03 pm
(Adams v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 1:41 pm
Rental Housing Owners Ass'n of Southern Alameda County, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
In Mejia v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am
States which use separate (rather than combined) reporting and nevertheless seek to tax GILTI face a serious constitutional challenge, particularly under the precedent of Kraft v. [read post]
