Search for: "Levy v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, 2012. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
” The bill would exempt “registered call centers in the United States, or foreign call centers who contract with a company registered in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 2:09 am
Conclusion The United States Supreme Court has concluded that “debt collector,” as defined under the FDCPA, must be narrowly construed. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Moreover, under United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 8:55 am
From today's U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
Levy, 417 U. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 11:39 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:48 am
(See, for example, arts. 36-40 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, of which the United States is virtually the only non-state-party, and also my Calling Children to Account: The Proposal for a Juvenile Chamber in the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 29 Pepperdine L. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:52 am
United States, 2018 WL 4568412 (D.D.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:58 pm
As applied, the ad valorem tax was improper because it was not levied for payment of “obligations approved by the electors” of the local governmental unit. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm
” Peter Strzok’s message cannot possibly be construed as levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
See also United States v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:43 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
That was after he’d seen a brief Sungaila had filed in a domestic-violence-related lawsuit against the United States before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
United States, 754 F. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:45 am
Therefore, there was no basis for compelling the identification of the web site’s operator.The standards for identifying anonymous Internet speakers was also addressed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in In re Anonymous Online Speakers, where the court declined to issue a mandamus overturning the discovery ruling in Quixtar Management v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
