Search for: "Lewis v. South Carolina, State of"
Results 1 - 20
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2010, 5:08 pm
South Carolina Coastal Commission is the rise of background principles of property and nuisance law as a categorical defense to takings claims. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:53 am
Judge Mary Geiger Lewis determined that the state's act preventing the placement of both parents' names went against the Supreme Court [official website] decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:13 am
Lewis, and now Judge Norton’s order in Brumfield v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 2:55 pm
Taylor unwittingly exposes serious flaws in South Carolina’s Family Court Rules–specifically the notice provision for rules to show cause and the ability of family court judges to alter custody or visitation as part of a contempt proceeding. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:25 pm
Because the club had no insurance, the South Carolina Uninsured Employers’ Fund was forced to defend. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:22 am
Ry of South Carolina v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:17 am
Baze v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
See this commentary by Walker Lewis. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:35 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
It's about the people of South Carolina. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
South Carolina’s Supreme Court first established this obligation in the case of Risinger v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 5:54 am
A recent South Carolina Court of Appeals case analyzed the employer/employee relationship vs. independent contractor under a most unique set of facts and circumstances. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 5:19 am
Lewis, 392 S.C. 381, , 709 S.E.2d 650 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2011). [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm
South Carolina is one of six states that require all or nearly all employers to use E-Verify. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:44 pm
These laws were subject to litigation, like the McCrory case in North Carolina and Veasey v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:03 am
The Court stated: [Nesbitt v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:05 am
One justice dissented (Lewis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:20 pm
” Von Spakovsky is also mistaken in claiming a three-judge federal court held DOJ “was wrong” in objecting to South Carolina’s 2011 photo ID law. [read post]
