Search for: "Lewis v. State of South Dakota"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 12:41 pm
The South Dakota Native Homeownership Coalition: Celebrating ten years of impact. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Tweedy University of South Dakota School of Law [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am
The Dormant Commerce Clause balancing test (the Pike v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:32 pm
The validity of tribal checkpoints in South Dakota to curb the spread of COVID-19. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
" (Remarks by President Trump at South Dakota’s 2020 Mount Rushmore Fireworks Celebration | Keystone, South Dakota )Destruction of Religion Images (Icons) in Zurich, 1524 / Creative CommonsThis was the narrative around which President Trump sought to understand the times, and with which he sought as well to motivate not just resistance but also a pro-active campaign to restore the American narrative to its glories as he envisions it (the full text of… [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
No nation has done more to advance the human condition than the United States of America and no people have done more to promote human progress than the citizens of our great nation. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 4:08 am
FERC (National Historic Preservation Act; Cultural Resources)United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-New Brunswick 1.55 $82,000 $53,000 Georgetown Univ. 1.56 $163,688 $105,000 Univ. of South Dakota 1.61 $79,143 $49,200 Univ. of Wyoming 1.62 $84,032 $52,000 West Virginia Univ. 1.65 $84,227 $51,100 Univ. of Arkansas at Little Rock 1.65 $77,208 $46,800 Coll. of William & Mary 1.65 $98,700 $59,800 Case Western Reserve Univ. 1.65 $82,570 $50,000 Univ. of Memphis 1.66 $76,622 $46,200 Arizona … [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
One example of this is the court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm
Kennedy has the opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
At Governing, Daniel Vock reports that during Tuesday’s oral argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The article, penned by lawyers at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, finds it curious that the courts in Madden didn’t resurrect and apply the VALID-WHEN-MADE doctrine, which even the authors admits has a scant grounding in recent caselaw. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The article, penned by lawyers at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, finds it curious that the courts in Madden didn’t resurrect and apply the VALID-WHEN-MADE doctrine, which even the authors admit has a scant grounding in recent caselaw. [read post]
