Search for: "Liberty Health Care Corporation" Results 21 - 40 of 592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Hobby Lobby decision allows closely held corporations - as defined by state and federal law - with religious objections to providing health insurance coverage for some or all forms of birth control to refuse to do so, even though this is required under the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:39 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Within a month, women in Arkansas could be prevented from receiving abortion care, no matter what their circumstances. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
On the federal front, there are the large for-profit corporations like Hobby Lobby, demanding a right under RFRA to shape their benefit packages in opposition to the Affordable Care Act and Title VII. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Liberty University was one of the first to go to court to protest the new health care law. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm by Holland & Hart
  The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was tasked with specifying which types of preventive care must be covered under that provision. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:00 am
Sepper The court's 2014 decision in the Hobby Lobby case to allow corporations to opt out of covering certain forms of birth control for employees was an anti-religous liberty decision, said Washington University in St. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:40 pm by uwlegalscholarship
Sebelius which provided for-profit corporations with a right to challenge the Affordable Care Act’s so-called “contraceptive mandate” on the basis that a corporation is a “person” who can have and exercise its own religious beliefs. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Flores in 1997 but that is an inconvenient fact they prefer to ignore.)Some of these manufactured rights have harmed women, for example: the Hobby Lobby multi-million-dollar corporation’s “right” to discriminate against female employees in their health care benefits by picking and choosing what healthcare the plan would cover according the owners’ beliefs in Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
At issue in today’s case is part of the Affordable Care Act that requires health plans to cover contraception without a co-pay. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:15 pm by Howard Friedman
 Hobby Lobby's attorney, citing the Supreme Court's Citizen's United case, argued that corporations have protected religious liberty rights. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm by Howard Friedman
 [However] "There’s just one fatal dish," is non-responsive to [plaintiffs'] point, which is that their religious liberty is directly threatened by the government’s edict....An entity’s incorporated status does not ... alter the underlying reality that corporations can and often do reflect the particular viewpoints held by their flesh and blood owners....Policymic reports on the decision. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:37 pm
These lawsuits alleged, that the subsidiaries violated the False Claims Act by submitting claims to Medicare without proper documentation of medical necessity, resulting in overbilling to federal health care programs. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:43 am by Marguerite Kenner
., the Court considered the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act (the “Act”) which makes it a crime to stand on a public road or sidewalk within thirty-five feet of a reproductive health care facility hence creating “buffer zones” outside of such facilities. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 11:17 am by Russell Knight
“It is presumed both parents are fit and the court shall not place any restrictions on parenting time… unless it finds by a preponderance of the evidence that a parent’s exercise of parenting time would seriously endanger the child’s physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (P.L. 111-148) amended Public Health Service Act sec. 2713 to require employer-sponsored health insurance plans to cover the preventive services rated A or B by the United States Preventive Services Task Force and any additional preventive services for women recommended in comprehensive guidelines issued by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Selecky, (Hastings Women's Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 303-37, Summer 2013).Tabatha Abu El-Haj, All Assemble: Order and Disorder in Law, Politics, and Culture, (University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2014 Forthcoming).Seema Mohapatra, Time to Lift the Veil of Inequality in Health Care Coverage: Using Corporate Law to Defend the Affordable Care Act, (May 23, 2014).Alice E. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:09 am by brown
Instead, insurance companies will provide this necessary component of comprehensive health care. [read post]