Search for: "Liberty v. Smith et al" Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
U.S. et al. are very much a part of the 2016 presidential contest. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, et. al., Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of The Constitutional Rights and Interests Of Children in Support of Respondents in Masterpiece Cakeshop LTD, et al v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by Mailee Smith
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Brownstein, Constitutional Myopia: The Supreme Court's Blindness to Religious Liberty and Religious Equality Values in Town of Greece v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 4:24 am by SHG
The motion of DKT Liberty Project, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am by John Elwood
  Finally, the Court is awaiting the record in the capital case Juan Smith v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
The father maintained that the trial judge should have considered whether it … Paniccia Estate et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In a memorandum opinion and order issued on March 27, 2024, in In re Yellow Corporation, et. al., Judge Craig T. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union et al., Doc. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm by Christa Culver
MittsDocket: 10-1000Issue(s): (1) Whether the State of Ohio offends due process by using the same penalty-phase jury instruction affirmed by this Court in Smith v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Wallace et al, 2014 ONSC 7449 (36315) When can third party records be subpoenaed. [read post]