Search for: "Light v. Ash"
Results 81 - 100
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
The March 6 decision by Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California in California v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The information came to light after “leaked” documents were published. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Events 15 May 2012, 7pm: #FCBBCA with Timothy Garton Ash: Is it time for a global conversation on free spe [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:13 pm
What new light does your book shed on the incident? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 3:57 am
In that context, it has been held that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (See Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 at [17] (Lord Nicholls) and that it is necessary to consider Strasbourg jurisprudence to establish the scope of that domestic cause of action, since those Articles are now “not merely of persuasive or parallel effect” but are “the very content of the… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Rumsfeld [16] and Burt v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm
In light of growing threats to the country, President Obama is considering plans to slow or halt the withdrawal of American troops. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
As was said in one case, “If information is my private property, it is for me to decide how much of it should be published”: McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, [2008] QB 73. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am
Taking the harm together, it is considerable – although (in the light of the survival of most of the physical features that currently contribute to significance, and in light of the various positive features of the scheme) not such as to reach the threshold of “serious” harm referred to in Penshurst (which corresponds with the concept of ‘substantial’ harm in the secular system). [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 11:58 am
Abdeslam is expected to stand trial “in a case that could shed further light on Islamist militant recruitment and networks in Europe. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
U.S. officials have denied Syrian accusations that U.S. coalition planes targeted a Syrian military base, and instead asserted that Russia was responsible for the strikes that killed four Syrian soldiers and wounded at least 13 others. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:37 am
The Kremlin has denied accusations that it hacked the Democratic National Committee’s emails in order to interfere with the U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican nominee Donald Trump, dismissing the allegations as “an old trick” and a “maniacal attemp[t] to exploit the Russian theme in the U.S. election campaign. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 10:03 pm
Supply, Inc v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
“We don’t know exactly where we’re at in the world militarily and what we’re doing,” said Sen. [read post]
