Search for: "Light v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 21 - 40 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Indeed, Commissioner Chopra’s laser focus on mitigating the potential impact of the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision in FTC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:44 pm by Sme
Berryhill (10th Cir., July 10, 2017) (affirming denial of social security benefits because, while Scott suffered from severe impairments, she retained the residual capacity to perform light work) *Olson v. [read post]
 With the looming uncertainty of the FTC’s restitution and disgorgement authority in light of the Supreme Court’s consideration of AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Comm Social Security    Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids SOCIAL SECURITY: COOK, Circuit Judge. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 7:30 am by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) provides in relevant part: Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. [read post]
” But the Commission also made clear that the SEC’s “broad discretion to require disclosure provides necessary latitude to expand or contract disclosure rules in light of changes in the relevant context in which securities issuers conduct their business. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:28 pm by Kathryn Moore
Section 405(g) provides that “[a]ny individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, … may obtain review of such decision by a civil action. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
Commissioner of Social Security, which the Supreme Court decided in April. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:40 am by admin
This issue is assessed particularly in light of the seemingly divergent approach to the wealth transfer in the interim injunction decision in Parkland as compared to the most recent fully contested merger decision in Tervita Corp v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:22 pm
Maurice Kay LJ also agreed with the Social Security Commissioner that Council Directive 2004/38/EC shed some light on the matter. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am by Rosalind English
It was an integral part of the move to combine tax allowances and social security benefits into a seamless tax credit system [30]. [read post]