Search for: "Light v. Wilson" Results 101 - 120 of 816
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm by NL
Their Lordships had not considered it needed revisiting in the light of McCann v UK. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:44 am by Blog Editorial
This will be heard by Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Wilson on Wednesday 27 July 2011. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:07 pm
Mohamed Foda of Leduc, Alberta, who forced RateMDs to provide information about a negative poster through the California Northern District Court in Foda et al v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 9:13 pm
Verna Wilson & Ors, R (on the application of) v Coventry City Council [2008] EWHC 2300 (Admin) was a judicial review of the decisions by Coventry and Havering councils to close care homes with elderly residents suffering from dementia or physical disability. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
  A case may be transferred out of the List where it “…falls within the scope of the list but would more conveniently be dealt with in another court or list and make such order as the court considers appropriate in the light of its conclusions. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
Nevertheless, rather than allowing uncertainty to prevail over varying degrees of precariousness in light of potential paths to settlement, Lord Wilson favoured the application of a bright-line approach and held that a person’s immigration status in the UK can be precarious even when he or she is lawfully present here. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Wilson stated that the court had to consider the SSHD’s policy relating to the detention of mentally ill persons pending deportation and the effect of any failure by the SSHD to apply that Policy, in the light of R (Francis) [2014] EWCA Civ 718. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 1:00 am by Douglas Waddell, Brodies LLP
Lord Wilson delivered the judgment on behalf of the court. [read post]