Search for: "Lights v. Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2017, 3:33 pm
"So basically, for up to three days (or more), you're crammed into a room with no bed, freezing your butt off with only a Mylar sheet, crammed into a tiny room with the lights on 24/7, unable to sleep or lie down -- again, for three days -- while people get moved in and out all day and night.Not good. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 12:20 pm
Employee docked 20 days of vacation credit as the penalty for being AWOLMatter of Bland v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 08987, decided on November 18, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNew York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:25 am
A story today in the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette by Niki Kelly adds background to the Court of Appeals' NFP yesterday in the case of Mark Lesh v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Finding Inherent Tribal Civil Power to Issue and Enforce Protection Orders Against All Persons in Light of Spurr v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:47 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Kelly authors today's post, an article about the meaning of the case. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ What Does The Florida Supreme Court's Ruling in System Components Corp. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 5:09 pm
As is the case with Kelly and Bell, it is difficult, in light of the particular facts, to challenge the result in Hall. [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:43 am
Although the Appellate Division noted that Garnes "was terminable without a hearing and without a statement of the reason for his dismissal," the court, citing York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760 and Matter of Johnson v Kelly, 33 AD3d 297, said that Garnes failed to demonstrate that his termination was made in bad faith, was unlawful, or was for an impermissible reason. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Appellate Division rules disciplinary penalty imposed on employee excessiveMatter of Gomez v Kelly, 2008 NY Slip Op 07181, Decided on October 2, 2008, Appellate Division, First DepartmentNew York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Tours of active military duty considered for the purpose of mitigating disciplinary penalty imposed on employee Gomez v Kelly, 55 AD3d 305 New York City Police Commissioner Raymond W. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
" Which was added by the Legislature specifically in response to a 2001 decision of the Court of Appeal that said that such items were not burglary tools under the statute.So, given that list, as well as the common understanding of what a burglary tool is, and in light of the ejusdem generis rule of construction, which of the following are burglary tools the possession of which are prohibited by Section 466 notwithstanding their failure to be specificially enumerated:(A) Box cutters. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:06 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 9/23/09Cite: Bires v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
She writes:[141] One cannot quarrel with the outcomes in Bell and Kelly in light of their particular facts. [read post]