Search for: "Lilley v. Lilley" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 3:59 am
Attaining tenure by estoppelLilley v Mills, App. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 6:44 am by Tracy Thomas
Lilley, 22 Journal of Gender, Race & Justice (2019) This Article uses New Hampshire v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:01 am by Public Employment Law Press
Retaliation against an employee for reporting improper governmental action prohibited by Civil Service Law §75-b, the "Whistleblower Statute"Lilley v Greene Cent. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:02 am by Jeremy
Victor Lilley v Euromoney Institutional Investor plc and Metal Bulletin plc; Victor Lilley v Chartered Institute of Management Accountants; Victor Lilley v Aspermont UK Ltd [2014] EWHC 2364 (Ch) is actually a trilogy of actions on which Mr Justice Birss ruled in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last week. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
This Kat brings you a cautionary tale from the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (“IPEC”), England and Wales, where in Lilley v DMG Events Ltd [2014] EWHC 610 (IPEC), 12 March 2014, a significant exaggeration of the damages claimed in respect of a copyright infringement has led to a case being struck out of court. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 10:14 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Lilley (Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2019) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 4:02 am by Peter Groves
It's now 13 years since Lord Hoffmann told us definitively how to interpret patents claims, in his opinion in Kirin Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel [2005] 1 All ER 667. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Molly Runkle
The Court also issued an opinion in Voisine v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 3:19 am by Alex Woolgar
Indeed a judge or recorder hearing a case may not be aware of a pattern of a misguided litigant (such as Mr Lilley of Lilley v DMG Events Ltd [2014] EWHC 610 (IPEC)) incurring unaffordable fees over various cases. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
In doing so, he considered Lilley v Roney (1892) 61 LJQB 727, which held that ‘form is of the first importance’ when initiating complaints to bodies authorised to determine them. [read post]