Search for: "Lincoln v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
" Article II requires the President to take an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 10:30 pm
Like it or not, it is coming to the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:12 am
The United States Constitution was crafted in a remarkable era of politics, philosophy, and deliberative debate. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
EPA which vacated an EPA ruling that excluded the application of pesticides to, over, or near, waters of the United States from permitting requirements under the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Taney In 1826, Taney and Daniel Webster represented a client in a case that appeared before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:29 am by Scott Bomboy
On Friday morning, President Donald Trump said he would declare a national emergency to allocate more funds to expand walls or barriers at the United States-Mexico border. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
[5] Levinson, ‘Perpetual Union’, at 466 (citing Abraham Lincoln: Speeches and Writings 1859-1865 202 (Don E. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Pennsylvania or Dred Scott, it would also have been helpful to include some relevant cases from northern states, such as  licensing Roberts v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
The ACA provides that territories of the United States (e.g., Guam) are “States,” for purposes of this law. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]