Search for: "Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co. (2000)" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2011, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429 ) by plaintiffs and by defendants, depending on who it helps, for the proposition that courts cannot look at a case’s merits in ruling on class certification. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am by Steven G. Pearl
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429] nor other Supreme Court authority forecloses courts from examining a legal issue in addressing certification. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429, 435-436; accord, Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429, 434), the class action not only benefits the individual litigant but serves the public interest in the enforcement of legal rights and statutory sanctions. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:32 pm by Larry Golub
Thrifty Oil Co., 23 Cal. 4th 429, 443 (2000), the Court stated: “[W]e see nothing to prevent a court from considering the legal sufficiency of claims when ruling on certification where both sides jointly request such action. [read post]