Search for: "Lines v. Lines"
Results 21 - 40
of 45,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 6:13 pm
From oral argument today in Beckles v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:13 pm
From oral argument today in Beckles v. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Police Identify Woman Who Died on Zip Line Platform in Delaware, ABC News, August 25, 2016, By Catherine Thorbecke More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
This case effectively overrules the case Barbetta v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
Sometimes, selecting the line and pressing the Delete key will remove the line. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:58 am
Court of Appeals decision in Texas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:09 am
Sas v OHIM, Limiñana y Botella, SL offered guidance at paragraph 67:'The fact that the average consumer retains only an imperfect mental image of the trade mark renders the dominant element of the mark in question of major importance'.While this decision has been criticised, it makes good sense to me. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:43 am
Injury in the line of dutyMatter of Stymiloski v DiNapoli, 2009 NY Slip Op 05675, Decided on July 2, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPaul A. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:03 am
Determining line-of-duty disabilityErtner v Chenango County, 280 A.D.2d 851In considering the standard to apply in determining line-of-duty disability for the purpose of demonstrating eligibility for Section 207-c benefits, in the Ertner case, the Appellate Division, Third Department said that:While it would be virtually impossible to enumerate each and every instance in which an employee would be entitled to General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefits as opposed to… [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:58 pm
In Lines v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:48 am
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Air Lines Inc [2011] EWCA Civ 162; [2011] WLR (D) 60 “Notwithstanding the difficulties which could arise in cases where the technology was complex, it should not be assumed that summary judgment was not for patent disputes; the general rules as to summary judgment applied equally to patent cases as to other types of case and where the technology was relatively simple to understand, and the court was able, on summary application, to form a… [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:43 pm
YouTube, UMG v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 10:45 am
This is the second installment of the ImmigrationProf blog on-line symposium on the Fifth Circuit's ruling on Monday in Texas v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 1:08 pm
Here is the latest installment in ImmigrationProf Blog's On-Line symposium on Texas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:04 am
Here is the latest installment in ImmigrationProf Blog's On-Line symposium on Texas v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 10:40 am
Over the next month or so, the ImmigrationProf blog will be running an on-line symposium on the Fifth Circuit's ruling in Texas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 1:08 pm
Michael Kagan provides the latest installment in ImmigrationProf Blog's On-Line symposium on Texas v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:32 am
Today's 9th Circuit opinion in Williams v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
The case of Deichmann SE v EUIPO concerned the registration of a trademark involving a cross design on the side of a shoe, where the shoe itself was marked using dotted lines to illustrate the position of the mark (EUTM 2923852). [read post]
