Search for: "Lines v. Lines"
Results 41 - 60
of 45,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2019, 1:24 am
The case of Deichmann SE v EUIPO concerned the registration of a trademark involving a cross design on the side of a shoe, where the shoe itself was marked using dotted lines to illustrate the position of the mark (EUTM 2923852). [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Though no court has ruled directly on the use of copyright-protected images to train an AI system, recent ruling such as the Authors Guild v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:53 pm
The case is Doe v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:34 am
Sept. 28, 2018); Hodes v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:34 pm
Cir. 2013) Download Allergan v SandozPanel: Dyk (dissenting-in-part), Prost (author), O'Malley Allergan illustrates how thin the line between obvious and nonobvious can sometimes be. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:45 am
Share On Monday, April 25, the court hears oral argument in Kennedy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:06 pm
The federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Corp. v. [read post]
Uncertain Boundary Line and Missing Monuments - Some Rules For How You Locate the Line in California
14 Aug 2014, 8:05 am
In Jacques Bloxham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:56 am
This is the first installment in an on-line symposium on the Fifth Circuit's ruling on November 9 in Texas v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 2:28 am
Determining line-of-duty disability Ertner v Chenango County, 280 AD2d 851 In considering the standard to apply in determining line-of-duty disability for the purpose of demonstrating eligibility for Section 207-c benefits, in the Ertner case, the Appellate Division, Third Department said that: While it would be virtually impossible to enumerate each and every instance in which an employee would be entitled to General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefits as opposed to… [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 8:36 am
esure Insurance Ltd v Direct Line Insurance plc Court of Appeal “An expert's report was of little value in evaluating the likelihood of trade-mark confusion from the standpoint of a consumer. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:28 am
Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane SpA v Rotunno and Others Chancery Division “There was no reason not to give the word ’secure’ its usual meaning as a transitive verb when contained within the words ‘to secure the benefits under the scheme’ in a set of trust rules. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Nathan Webb and Washburn student intern William Drexler won in State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:08 am
” — Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the Court in Riley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 7:39 am
The case reopened the “bright-line rule” and the so-called “professional litigant exception, ” formulated by former Justice Ian Binnie in R. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:06 am
Yesterday, the SCOTUSBlog on-line symposium commenced with two posts. [read post]
