Search for: "Lingle v. Lingle Coal Co." Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A Landmark Centennial From a Land Marked By the Past, by Sam Spiegelman
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am by Guest Author
Supreme Court’s landmark regulatory takings decision—Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Amicus Brief In Guggenheim: Ninth Circuit "Did Violence" To Penn Central Test
15 Apr 2011, 8:28 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Chevron USA, Inc., 544 U.S. 528, 537 (2005) (quoting Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
inversecondemnation.com - http://www.inversecondemnation.com/inversecondemnation/
[Jonathan H. Adler] Supreme Court Rejects Opportunity to Reconsider Penn Central
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
" Pennsylvania Coal Co. v.Mahon, 260 U. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Regulatory Takings Law: Ninth Circuit Panel Holds A Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance Is Subject To A "Facial Challenge" And Awards Compensation To Property Owners
1 Oct 2009, 2:45 pm
Although the court acknowledged that such facial challenges to partial takings remain “difficult,” they are viable for the range of claims involving diminution in value resulting from regulation which are not total wipe outs, but nevertheless arguably “go too far” under Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
Real Estate and Construction Law Blog - http://www.realestatelanduseandenvironmentallaw.com/
U.S. SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT TEMPORARY ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS APPROPRIATED BY THE GOVERNMENT IS A PER SE PHYSICAL TAKING, GIVING RISE TO NUMEROUS NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE LAWFULNESS OF MANY GOVERNMENT INSPECTION REGIMES
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
 The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
U.S. SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT TEMPORARY ACCESS TO PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS APPROPRIATED BY THE GOVERNMENT IS A PER SE PHYSICAL TAKING, GIVING RISE TO NUMEROUS NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THE LAWFULNESS OF MANY GOVERNMENT INSPECTION REGIMES
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
 The original statement comes from Justice Holmes, who wrote in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis?
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
Co. v. [read post]
Ackerman Ackerman & Dynkowski Journal - https://ackerman-ackerman.com/journal/