Search for: "Lingo v. Lingo"
Results 61 - 80
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 1:41 pm
Just ignore the lingo. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 3:37 pm
" The post DEI Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
West Virginia State School Board of Education v. [read post]
9 Sep 2018, 5:45 am
The text of the law but is replete with fluid lingoes. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Decepticon Hasbro, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:43 am
The following excerpts are from Bowen v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:40 am
Apple v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
A googol, in mathematical lingo, is a 1 followed by 100 zeros. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
Moreover, as used in Delaware law, the term “misappropriation” often implies dishonest or wrongful intent, or breach of duty (see e.g. 6 Del C § 2001 [1], [2] [misappropriation of trade secrets]; In re Vanderslice, 55 A3d 322, 326 [Del 2012] [attorney committed theft by "misappropriating" client funds]; Lingo v Lingo, 3 A3d 241, 242, 244 [Del 2010] [attorney-in-fact committed a "breach of trust" by misappropriating funds]). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:41 pm
See Cybor Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:47 am
" Justice Antonin Scalia offers his test for deciding whether legal lingo should be excised from a brief: "If you used the word at a cocktail party, would people look at you funny? [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:41 am
Huawei v. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:54 am
I also blame the “-wrap” lingo, which I think has single-handedly hindered the development of online contract law for years (see, e.g., my discussion about Fteja). [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 7:53 am
However, a major step in the right direction toward addressing implicit racism in the New Jersey courts was recently taken by the New Jersey Supreme Court when it issued its unanimous decision in State v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:31 am
This month, I've come up with some totally fetch new catchphrases that you can work in to your employment law lingo! [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:58 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:16 pm
It compares human review results to Equivio>Relevance ™ results and found that “Out of the 4,107 documents in which the review analyses differed, the Oracle ["Topic Authority” in TREC lingo, aka “subject matter expert"] reviewed a statistically drawn sample of 190 documents, or slightly less than 5% of the documents in dispute. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm
” Bing Shun Li v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 2:05 am
The Federal Circuit decision in HZNP Medicines LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 8:43 pm
Of course, Panetti v. [read post]
