Search for: "Link v. C. I. R"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
" I expected to see detailed consideration of the "honest practices in industrial and commercial matters" proviso, as in Volvo v Heritage, but the judge wasn't asked to get into that.Regarding the passing-off claims, these stood or fell with the trade mark claims, and the judge explained the connection between the two which strikes me as an interesting point: Had I found that the message conveyed by TLL’s use of its roundel and the M… [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 8:22 am
V. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:02 am
I doubt that this one will be any different. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
R. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
[Here are the links to Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV of this series.] [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
I discovered it during my stint teaching IP at Essex University, when I would take a day a week off from my day job and trek across the country. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:12 am
In a 2019 journal article, political scientists Robert C. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:08 am
" It's by lawprofs John Yoo and Saikrishna Prakash (and I'm not going to look at the comments to see what I assume is a lot of negativity toward Yoo).It's hard to link to something I remember hearing in a podcast, but I think it was this episode. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
P. 26(c)(1). [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 2:10 pm
Araya, R (on the application of) v Leeds City Council [2009] EWHC 1962 (Admin) was a judicial review of just such a decision on to give notice on existing accommodation and offer an alternative place, which raises a couple of interesting points. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 2:56 pm
S, R (on the application of) v A Social Security Commissioner & Ors [2009] EWHC 2221 (Admin) This was an application for Judicial Review of a decision of the Social Security Commissioner refusing leave to appeal a decision of the Social Security Appeal Tribunal. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:11 am
I have a bomb. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
Here are the links to the cases that I spoke about in my session in today's seminar "Supreme Court, Regulatory Takings and Eminent Domain Update. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:39 am
There is a lot to criticize in the Schuette opinion, but I wanted to focus on a point that I haven’t seen raised elsewhere, but that I raise in a forthcoming article in the NYU Journal of Law & Liberty, which I will post a link to when its ready. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
Art. 40 Brussels I Bis [10] See ECJ July, 13, 2006, C-4/03, Gat v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
IN THE MATTER OF RISK LEVEL DETERMINATION OF R. [read post]
SonrÃa, lo estamos filmando (sobre un fallo por utilización de cámaras en el acceso de edificios)
17 May 2005, 9:18 am
"MANCINI, Guillermo Carlos c/ CONSORCIO DE PROPIETARIOS LIMA 355 Y OTRO s/ DAÑOS Y PERJUICIOS" (J. 31) - Expte. 4.282/2003 - Sala I de la Cámara Civil de la Capital.He aquà un planteo de constitucionalidad de la vida cotidiana, que me parecÃa de resolución simple, pero que más de una vez he oido formular. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 12:00 am
C-081300. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 10:33 am
Anyone wishing to read the Whiting case may click this LINK Anyone wishing to review the Sabella case on the same topic may click this LINK I send thanks to Attorney William C. [read post]
