Search for: "Lipp v. Lipp" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2009, 1:21 pm
Contrary to what Peter Lippe believes (see previous Novalawcity blog post), law faculty are not always focused on theoretical topics that are irrelevant to the practice of law. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:50 am by Legal Skills Prof
Paul Lippe has an excellent article in the ABA Journal, Law school leaders are dividing into two camps: stuck v. serious. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Estate of Smulewicz v Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP  2018 NY Slip Op 02722 Decided on April 19, 2018  Appellate Division, First Department plaintiff got the benefit of continuous representation, but not “insanity” in the nature of dementia. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Giardina v Lippes, 2010 NY Slip Op 06834;; Appellate Division, Fourth Department we see two things. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Giardina v Lippes, 2010 NY Slip Op 06834; Decided on October 1, 2010;  Appellate Division, Fourth Department we see two things. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Ray-Roseman v Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, LLP  2021 NY Slip Op 04841 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department shows how one can demonstrate continuing representation. [read post]