Search for: "Lipp v. Lipp"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 1:21 pm
Contrary to what Peter Lippe believes (see previous Novalawcity blog post), law faculty are not always focused on theoretical topics that are irrelevant to the practice of law. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Paul Lippe has an excellent article in the ABA Journal, Law school leaders are dividing into two camps: stuck v. serious. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:28 am
Lipp v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:24 pm
ABA Journal Legal Rebels: Law School Leaders Are Dividing Into Two Camps: Stuck v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:17 am
Lipp v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
Lipp v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 1:41 pm
In Yassky v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:58 am
Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel, P.C.,... [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:16 pm
Lipp v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
Apotex, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:55 am
Here, in Estate of Smulewicz v Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP 2018 NY Slip Op 02722 Decided on April 19, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department plaintiff got the benefit of continuous representation, but not “insanity” in the nature of dementia. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:06 pm
In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:00 am
In Lipp v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:16 am
In Giardina v Lippes, 2010 NY Slip Op 06834;; Appellate Division, Fourth Department we see two things. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
In Giardina v Lippes, 2010 NY Slip Op 06834; Decided on October 1, 2010; Appellate Division, Fourth Department we see two things. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:35 am
In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:35 am
In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:35 am
In Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am
Ray-Roseman v Lippes Mathias Wexler Friedman, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 04841 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department shows how one can demonstrate continuing representation. [read post]